The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-6937•Anthony Bernard Burnside v. Davida Mathis
04-6937Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 23, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6937
ANTHONY BERNARD BURNSIDE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DAVIDA MATHIS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-04-939-6)
Submitted: July 15, 2004 Decided: July 23, 2004
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Bernard Burnside, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Bernard Burnside appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and
find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Burnside v.
Mathis, No. CA-04-939-6 (D.S.C. Apr. 26, 2004). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.