William Hencely Davis, Jr v. W. Osmond Smith, Iii

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6890
WILLIAM HENCELY DAVIS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
W. OSMOND SMITH, III,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 04-6951
WILLIAM HENCELY DAVIS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOEL H. BREWER,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,
District Judge, and N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge.
(CA-04-43-1; CA-03-1189-1)
Submitted: August 26, 2004 Decided: September 3, 2004

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Before WIDENER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Hencely Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
William Hencely Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s
orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaints under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the records and
find that these appeals are frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeals on the reasoning of the district court. See Davis v.
Smith, No. CA-04-43-1; Davis v. Brewer, No. CA-03-1189-1 (M.D.N.C.
filed Mar. 29, 2004 & entered Mar. 30, 2004; Apr. 30, 2004). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --