The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-6866•Henry Babatunde Sonowo v. George Snyder
04-6866Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 3, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6866
HENRY BABATUNDE SONOWO,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
GEORGE SNYDER; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS;
U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE;
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-04-135-5-BO)
Submitted: August 26, 2004 Decided: September 3, 2004
Before WIDENER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Henry Babatunde Sonowo, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Henry Babatunde Sonowo appeals the district court’s order
denying his petition for writ of mandamus in which he requested
that the district court direct action by the Defendants to commence
his deportation hearing and to complete the statutory
administrative process. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Sonowo v. Snyder, No. CA-04-135-5-BO (E.D.N.C.
Apr. 26, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.