The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-6805•Barry Hall v. Brett Edmonds
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6805
BARRY HALL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BRETT EDMONDS; D. A. BRAXTON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District
Judge. (CA-04-136)
Submitted: September 9, 2004 Decided: September 15, 2004
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Barry Hall, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Barry Hall appeals the district court’s orders denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and his subsequent
motions to amend his complaint, to alter judgment, and for relief
from judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Hall v. Edmonds, No. CA-04-136 (W.D. Va.
Mar. 24 and Apr. 16, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.