United States of America v. Custis, 988 F.2d 1355, 1395 4th Cir. 1993 providing standard . Accordingly, we deny…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6768
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM M. BRYSON, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-01-240; CR-01-712)
Submitted: September 10, 2004 Decided: September 29, 2004
Before LUTTIG, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William M. Bryson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Jennings
Caughman, Mark C. Moore, Beth Drake, Assistant United States
Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina; Regan Alexandra Pendleton,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
William M. Bryson, Jr., appeals from the district court’s
order denying his motion filed pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 33, in
which Bryson asserted newly discovered evidence. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. See United States v.
Custis, 988 F.2d 1355, 1395 (4th Cir. 1993) (providing standard).
Accordingly, we deny Bryson’s motion for an extension of time to
file a response, deny as moot the Government’s motion to
consolidate this appeal with another appeal filed by Bryson, and
affirm the district court’s order denying Bryson’s motion. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --