The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-6767•United States of America v. John Jairo Gomez
04-6767Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 27, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6767
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JOHN JAIRO GOMEZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CR-95-385-AW; CA-99-3288-AW)
Submitted: July 9, 2004 Decided: July 27, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Jairo Gomez, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Suzanne Skalla,
Assistant United States Attorney, Deborah A. Johnston, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
John Jairo Gomez appeals the district court’s order
denying his “Motion to Quash and Correct Sentence Pursuant to Plain
Error.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See United States v. Gomez, Nos. CR-95-385-AW; CA-99-3288-
AW (D. Md. Apr. 13, 3004). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.