The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-6744•Keith Lauchon Jackson, Sr v. Jeff L. Fleming
04-6744Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 2, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6744
KEITH LAUCHON JACKSON, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JEFF L. FLEMING,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CA-04-154)
Submitted: June 24, 2004 Decided: July 2, 2004
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith Lauchon Jackson, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Keith Lauchon Jackson, Sr., appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint, and the
district court’s order denying his motion for relief under Fed. R.
Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Jackson v. Fleming, No. CA-04-154 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 19 &
Apr. 8, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.