The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-6731•Martina Van Hoef v. U.s. Immigration & Customs Enforcement
04-6731Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 28, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6731
MARTINA VAN HOEF,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
U.S. IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (CA-04-76)
Submitted: September 16, 2004 Decided: September 28, 2004
Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Martina Van Hoef, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Martina Van Hoef seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint which
the district court construed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss
the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Van
Hoef v. U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, No. CA-04-76 (E.D.
Va. Mar. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.