The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-6694•David Farrell Sullivan v. Clay T. Allen
04-6694Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 2, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6694
DAVID FARRELL SULLIVAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CLAY T. ALLEN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
(CA-03-3841-7-26)
Submitted: June 24, 2004 Decided: July 2, 2004
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Farrell Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
David Farrell Sullivan appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his complaint under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 (2000). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Sullivan v. Allen, No. CA-03-3841-7-26 (D.S.C. Mar. 5, 2004). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.