The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-6658•United States of America v. Anthony Grandison
04-6658Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 15, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6658
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ANTHONY GRANDISON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge.
(CR-83-200-WDQ)
Submitted: August 20, 2004 Decided: September 15, 2004
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Grandison, Appellant Pro Se. Juliet Ann Eurich, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Grandison appeals the district court’s order
entered in accordance with the mandate in United States v.
Grandison, No. 03-6465 (4th Cir. Dec. 31, 2003) (unpublished). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.