The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-6649•James Ben Smith v. WILLIAM SMITH, Sheriff of Lenoir County
04-6649Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 13, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6649
JAMES BEN SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM SMITH, Sheriff of Lenoir County and
the Manicipality of Lenoir County; JOHN AND
JANE DOES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-04-172-5-BO)
Submitted: September 20, 2004 Decided: December 13, 2004
Before LUTTIG and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Ben Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
James Ben Smith appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as
frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Smith v. Smith, No.
CA-04-172-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 29, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.