United States of America v. Earnest Haynesworth

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6578
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
EARNEST HAYNESWORTH,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (CR-00-52)
Submitted: July 19, 2004 Decided: August 3, 2004
Before LUTTIG and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Earnest Haynesworth, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Richard Murphy,
Special Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Earnest Haynesworth appeals the district court’s orders
denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g) motion for return of property
and motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See United States v. Haynesworth, No. CR-
00-52 (E.D. Va. Feb. 11, 2004). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --