The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-6552•United States of America v. Patrice Behanzin Wilson, a/k/a K-Mel
04-6552Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 19, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6552
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
PATRICE BEHANZIN WILSON, a/k/a K-Mel,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (CR-96-34)
Submitted: October 1, 2004 Decided: October 19, 2004
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patrice Behanzin Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. John Samuel Bowler,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Patrice Behanzin Wilson appeals the district court’s
margin order denying his motion for reconsideration of the district
court’s order denying his motion for an extension of time to file
a notice of appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the court.
See United States v. Wilson, No. CR-96-34 (E.D.N.C. Jan 23, 2004).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.