The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-6491•Jerry Bernard Jackson v. Kelly Miller, prosecutor at Mecklenburg County courts
04-6491Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 20, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6491
JERRY BERNARD JACKSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KELLY MILLER, prosecutor at Mecklenburg
County courts; SEAN F. PERRIN, prosecutor
at Mecklenburg County courts; KATHLEEN K.
LUCCHESI, prosecutor at Mecklenburg County
courts,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CA-04-12-3)
Submitted: May 13, 2004 Decided: May 20, 2004
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry Bernard Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Jerry Bernard Jackson appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the district court’s reasoning that Defendants were
entitled to absolute immunity. See Jackson v. Miller, No.
CA-04-12-3 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 17, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.