The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-6432•Paul B. Goist v. JOSEPH SMITH, Warden
04-6432Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 3, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6432
PAUL B. GOIST,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
JOSEPH SMITH, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-03-3021-20BD)
Submitted: April 28, 2005 Decided: May 3, 2005
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul B. Goist, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Paul B. Goist, a federal prisoner, appeals from the
district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of a
petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See Goist v. Smith, No. CA-03-
3021-20BD (D.S.C. Feb. 13, 2004). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.