The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-6255•United States of America v. Freddie Eugene Walker, a/k/a Big Freddie
04-6255Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 3, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6255
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
FREDDIE EUGENE WALKER, a/k/a Big Freddie,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson,
District Judge. (CR-95-39)
Submitted: May 27, 2004 Decided: June 3, 2004
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Freddie Eugene Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Michael R. Smythers,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Freddie Eugene Walker appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See United States v. Walker, No. CR-95-39 (E.D.
Va. Nov. 25, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.