The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-6226•Gabriel A. Antonio v. JAMES MOORE, Detective
04-6226Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 2, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6226
GABRIEL A. ANTONIO,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
JAMES MOORE, Detective; LISA ZANDEL,
Magistrate,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (CA-04-33-AM)
Submitted: May 7, 2004 Decided: June 2, 2004
Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gabriel A. Antonio, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
* We note, as did the district court, that Antonio may pursue
his grievances under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) after exhausting his
state court remedies.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Gabriel A. Antonio appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. * See Antonio v. Moore, No. CA-04-33-AM (E.D. Va.
filed Jan. 20, 2004; entered Jan. 21, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.