The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-6221•Learie A. Daly v. MELANIE C. PEREIRA, Director
04-6221Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 12, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6221
LEARIE A. DALY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MELANIE C. PEREIRA, Director; MR. BRANSON,
Grievance Coordinator,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
MCLINDSEY HAWKINS, Chief of Security,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-03-
1441-1-AMD)
Submitted: June 2, 2004 Decided: July 12, 2004
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Learie A. Daly, Appellant Pro Se. Louis Paul Ruzzi, Barbara McFaul
Cook, County Solicitor, Katherine Lee Taylor, COUNTY SOLICITOR’S
OFFICE, Ellicott City, Maryland, for Appellees.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Learie A. Daly appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Daly v. Pereira,
No. CA-03-1441-1-AMD (D. Md. Jan. 6, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.