The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-6172•Steven W. Bell v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of North Carolina
04-6172Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 26, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6172
STEVEN W. BELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of North
Carolina; PAUL L. JONES, Judge; G. DEWEY
HUDSON; SAMPSON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; KEN
H. CROW,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,
District Judge. (CA-03-714-5-H)
Submitted: June 10, 2004 Decided: July 26, 2004
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven W. Bell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Steven W. Bell appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Bell v. Dep’t of Revenue, No. CA-03-714-5-H
(E.D.N.C. Nov. 26, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.