The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-6158•Charles Jones, a/k/a Nicholas Warner Jones, a/k/a Jeffrey Victor Warner v. ARRIE W. DAVIS, Judge
04-6158Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 2, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6158
CHARLES JONES, a/k/a Nicholas Warner Jones,
a/k/a Jeffrey Victor Warner,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ARRIE W. DAVIS, Judge; ROBERT M. BELL, Chief
Judge; BALTIMORE CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA-
03-3526-RDB)
Submitted: March 25, 2004 Decided: April 2, 2004
Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Charles Jones appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. Davis,
No. CA-03-3526-RDB (D. Md. Dec. 17, 2003). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.