The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-6142•Larry Scott, a/k/a John Doe v. Doctor Gowan
04-6142Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 19, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6142
LARRY SCOTT, a/k/a John Doe,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DOCTOR GOWAN; CARL MITCHELL, Doctor,
Physician,
Defendants - Appellees,
versus
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; GARY
MAYNARD, Director,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (CA-02-4206-3-22BC)
Submitted: May 13, 2004 Decided: May 19, 2004
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Roy Settana, Jr., MCKAY,
MCKAY & SETTANA, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Larry Scott appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Scott v. Gowan, No. CA-
02-4206-3-22BC (D.S.C. Dec. 29, 2003). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.