The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-6141•Larry Lamont Bush v. ELLSWORTH JONES, Det. 4444
04-6141Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 9, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6141
LARRY LAMONT BUSH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ELLSWORTH JONES, Det. 4444; TIM HOLEVAS,
Ofcr/Det #1041,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-03-
02263-01-AMD)
Submitted: May 28, 2004 Decided: July 9, 2004
Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Lamont Bush, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara McFaul Cook, County
Solicitor, Louis Paul Ruzzi, Carol Saffran-Brinks, COUNTY
SOLICITOR’S OFFICE, Ellicott City, Maryland, Andrew Jensen Murray,
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Annapolis, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Larry Lamont Bush seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Bush v. Jones, No. CA-03-02263-01-AMD (D. Md. filed
Jan. 5, 2004, entered Jan. 6, 2004). We deny the motion for
appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.