The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-6140•Edward Thomas Seymour, Iii v. Deputy Basham
04-6140Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 19, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6140
EDWARD THOMAS SEYMOUR, III,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DEPUTY BASHAM; DEPUTY BOTTELER; JOHN A.
BARTLETT, JR., Calvert County Sheriff; R. A.
FIGUERIS, Deputy, Badge #1215; A. C.
MOSCHETTO, Deputy, Badge #4341; CALVERT
COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE; DEPUTYS NAME IN
STATEMENT; DEPUTYS DEPICTED BUT UNKNOWN,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
LISA RIDGE, Assistant States Attorney; SHEILA
SULLIVAN, Assistant Public Defender; UNKNOWN
PARTICIPATING OFFICERS IN A & B ARREST,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District Judge.
(CA-03-1009-1-MJG; CA-03-1138-1-MJG)
Submitted: March 11, 2004 Decided: March 19, 2004
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Thomas Seymour, III, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Breads,
Jr., LOCAL GOVERNMENT INSURANCE TRUST, Columbia, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Edward Thomas Seymour, III appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Seymour
v. Basham, Nos. CA-03-1009-1-MJG; CA-03-1138-1-MJG (D. Md. filed
Dec. 23, 2003 & entered Dec. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.