The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-6128•Charles Brown v. Joseph M. Brooks
04-6128Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 21, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6128
CHARLES BROWN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
JOSEPH M. BROOKS; UNITED STATES PAROLE
COMMISSION,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-03-346-2)
Submitted: May 12, 2004 Decided: May 21, 2004
Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Lynn Van Valkenburg,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Charles Brown, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge
and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Brown v. Brooks, No. CA-03-346-2 (E.D. Va. Nov. 26, 2003). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.