The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-6052•James A. Butler v. Warden
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6052
JAMES A. BUTLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WARDEN; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (CA-02-4102-1-WMN)
Submitted: September 17, 2004 Decided: December 21, 2004
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James A. Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Wayne Mellady, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Annapolis Junction, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
James A. Butler appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his Federal Tort Claims Act suit. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Butler v. Warden,
No. CA-02-4102-1-WMN (D. Md. Oct. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.