The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-6028•Kevin Andre Rankin v. JOSEPH LIGHTSEY, Doctor
04-6028Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 12, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6028
KEVIN ANDRE RANKIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOSEPH LIGHTSEY, Doctor,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
JENNY CRAIG; M. BOONE, sued in their
individual capacities; SELMA TOWNES, sued in
her individual capacity and official capacity,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,
District Judge. (CA-02-483-5-H)
Submitted: March 15, 2004 Decided: April 12, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Andre Rankin, Appellant Pro Se. Dana Hefter Davis, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Kevin Andre Rankin appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rankin v.
Lightsey, No. CA-02-483-5-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 20, 2003). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.