The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-6006•United States of America v. Matthew Lane Drennen
04-6006Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 14, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6006
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MATTHEW LANE DRENNEN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,
District Judge. (CR-95-27-5)
Submitted: May 26, 2004 Decided: June 14, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Matthew Lane Drennen, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Martinsburg, West Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Matthew Lane Drennen appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See United States v. Drennen, No. CR-95-27-5
(N.D.W. Va. Oct. 9, 2003); see also United States v. Capers, 61
F.3d 1100, 1109 (4th Cir. 1992). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.