United States of America v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725 1993 . Accordingly, we: 1 affirm the district court’s

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-4446
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ROMER DENISE GADBERRY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
District Judge. (CR-01-66)
Submitted: December 8, 2004 Decided: January 11, 2005
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by unpublished per
curiam opinion.
Louis C. Allen, III, Federal Public Defender, John A. Dusenbury,
Jr., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina,
for Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, Angela
H. Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Romer Denise Gadberry appeals the district court’s order
of May 19, 2004, revoking her supervised release and reimposing a
term of fourteen months imprisonment and twenty-four months
supervised release under the terms and conditions previously set by
the court. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the
district court’s order constituted reversible error as to the term
of Gadberry’s supervised release. See United States v. Olano, 507
U.S. 725 (1993). Accordingly, we: (1) affirm the district court’s
order with respect to the fourteen-month term of imprisonment; (2)
vacate the district court’s order with respect to the twenty-four-
month term of supervised release; and, (3) remand this case to the
district court for imposition of a term of supervised release that
shall not exceed twenty-two months. See 18 U.S.C.A. § 3583(h)
(West Supp. 2004); United States v. Maxwell, 285 F.3d 336, 341-43
(4th Cir. 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED IN PART,
VACATED IN PART, AND REMANDED

-- 2 of 2 --