The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-4418•UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Party in Interest - v. Randy Lee Hammitt
04-4418Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 20, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-4418
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Party in Interest - Appellee,
versus
RANDY LEE HAMMITT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CA-03-14; BK-02-32597; CR-04-142)
Submitted: December 16, 2004 Decided: December 20, 2004
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randy Lee Hammitt, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Stanley Glaser, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
Rehearing granted and appeal dismissed, February 2, 2005
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Randy Lee Hammitt appeals the district court’s order for
criminal contempt for failure to comply with court issued subpoenas
in an involuntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States
v. Hammitt, No. CA-03-14 (W.D.N.C. May 27, 2004). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.