Dillard’s, Incorporated v. Arlene Johnson

04-2528Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 25, 2005

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2528
DILLARD’S, INCORPORATED,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ARLENE JOHNSON,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.
(CA-03-2522)
Submitted: July 29, 2005 Decided: August 25, 2005
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Katherine Dudley Helms, William L. Duda, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH,
SMOAK & STEWART, P.C., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant.
Allen D. Smith, Thomas K. Barlow, CHILDS & HALLIGAN, P.A.,
Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Dillard’s Incorporated appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of Johnson. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Dillard’s Inc. v.
Johnson, No. CA-03-2522 (D.S.C. Nov. 5, 2004). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.