The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-2511•Anthony L. Scales v. Usf Logistics
04-2511Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 3, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2511
ANTHONY L. SCALES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
USF LOGISTICS; JILL PINTOZZI; RANDY HLADKY;
CHRIS JENNINGS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (CA-04-448)
Submitted: April 28, 2005 Decided: May 3, 2005
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony L. Scales, Appellant Pro Se. Mildred Bennett Wells,
MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Kristine Elizabeth Aubin,
CONNELLY, SHEEHAN, HARRIS, Chicago, Illinois, for Appellees
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Anthony L. Scales appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to the Defendants and dismissing Scales’
Title VII action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Scales v. USF Logistics, No. CA-04-448
(E.D. Va. Dec. 3, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.