The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-2508•Jamshid Farshidi v. Norfolk State University
04-2508Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 17, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2508
JAMSHID FARSHIDI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NORFOLK STATE UNIVERSITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (CA-03-56-2)
Submitted: February 7, 2005 Decided: February 17, 2005
Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jamshid Farshidi, Appellant Pro Se. Martha Murphey Parrish,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Patrick B. Kelly,
NORFOLK STATE UNIVERSITY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Dr. Jamshid Farshidi appeals the district court’s order
awarding $5000 in attorney’s fees to Defendant, the prevailing
party in this Title VII action. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(k) (2000);
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d). We conclude that the district court did not
abuse its discretion, and we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Farshidi v. Norfolk State Univ., No. CA-03-56-
2 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 15, 2004; entered Nov. 16, 2004). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.