The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-2488•Margaret Stoner v. United States Marine Corps/mccs
04-2488Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 26, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2488
MARGARET STONER,
Petitioner,
versus
UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS/MCCS; DIRECTOR,
OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
(04-0245)
Submitted: April 29, 2005 Decided: May 26, 2005
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Margaret Stoner, Petitioner Pro Se. Mary L. Hostetter, UNITED
STATES MARINE CORPS, Quantico, Virginia; Michael John Denney,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for
Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Margaret Stoner seeks review of the Benefits Review
Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s
denial of longshore disability benefits pursuant to 33 U.S.C.
§§ 901-950 (2000). Our review of the record discloses that the
Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
Board. See Stoner v. United States Marine Corps., No. 04-0245 (BRB
Nov. 18, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.