Cynthia Louise Dickey v. United States of America

04-2410Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 17, 2005

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2410
CYNTHIA LOUISE DICKEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant & Third Party Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
SHAUNA MACKE,
Third Party Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CA-03-761-2)
Submitted: April 22, 2005 Decided: May 17, 2005
Before WILKINSON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffrey F. Brooke, HUFF, POOLE & MAHONEY, P.C., Virginia Beach,
Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney,
Kent P. Porter, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk,
Virginia; George Janis Dancigers, Ann J. Premer, MCKENRY,
DANCIGERS, WARNER, DAWSON & LAKE, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia,
for Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Cynthia Louise Dickey appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of the United States in her
action filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed
the parties’ briefs and the joint appendix and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Dickey v. United States, No. CA-03-761-2 (E.D.
Va. Sept. 24, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.