The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-2382•Abraham Wearing v. Gate Concrete
04-2382Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 19, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2382
ABRAHAM WEARING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GATE CONCRETE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (CA-02-687-5-BO)
Submitted: April 14, 2005 Decided: April 19, 2005
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Abraham Wearing, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Kline Dorminey,
WIMBERLY, LAWSON, STECKEL, NELSON & SCHNEIDER, Atlanta, Georgia,
Melegia Lee Daniels, Jr., WIMBERLY, LAWSON, DANIELS & BRANDON LLC,
Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Abraham Wearing appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment for Gate Concrete and dismissing his
employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Wearing v. Gate Concrete, No.
CA-02-687-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.