The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-2364•Caroline Gain-Yo v. ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General
04-2364Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 5, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2364
CAROLINE GAIN-YO,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A77-868-215)
Submitted: June 15, 2005 Decided: July 5, 2005
Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bokwe G. Mofor, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D.
Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, James A. Hunolt, Senior
Litigation Counsel, Annette M. Wietecha, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Caroline Gain-Yo, a native and citizen of Cameroon, seeks
review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board)
denying her motion to reconsider and reopen removal proceedings.
We have reviewed the administrative record and conclude that the
Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Gain-Yo’s motion.
See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (b) (2005).
We accordingly deny the petition for review. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.