The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-2363•Melvin B. Wells, Jr v. United States of America
04-2363Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 4, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2363
MELVIN B. WELLS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; JOSEPH ORANGE, SSG.
Military Police; MICHALE J. SERRA,
Investigator (MP); MICHAEL J. HUFLER; SOPHIE
GONZALEZ, Sgt. Military Police; C. CARTER,
Lieutenant, and Provose Marshal,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (CA-04-292-2)
Submitted: February 24, 2005 Decided: March 4, 2005
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Melvin B. Wells, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Lynn Van
Valkenburg, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Melvin B. Wells, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
denying his civil action seeking damages as a result of his arrest
by military police at Fort Eustis. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Wells v. United States, No.
CA-04-292-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 18, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.