The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-2339•Kathryn Floyd Causey v. COLEMAN RANDALL, Human Resources Manager
04-2339Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 12, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2339
KATHRYN FLOYD CAUSEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
COLEMAN RANDALL, Human Resources Manager; CITY
OF MYRTLE BEACH SC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Thomas E. Rogers, III, Magistrate
Judge. (CA-03-1068)
Submitted: March 10, 2005 Decided: May 12, 2005
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kathryn Floyd Causey, Appellant Pro Se. Vance J. Bettis, Reyburn
Williams Lominack, III, GIGNILLIAT, SAVITZ & BETTIS, Columbia,
South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
*The parties consented to proceed before the magistrate judge
under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Kathryn Floyd Causey appeals the magistrate judge’s order
denying relief without prejudice in her civil action. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge.* See
Causey v. Randall, No. CA-03-1068 (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2004).
Causey’s motion for preparation of a transcript at government
expense is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.