The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-2320•United States of America v. Nellie H. Roberson
04-2320Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 17, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2320
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
NELLIE H. ROBERSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Margaret B. Seymour, District
Judge. (CA-03-3117-5)
Submitted: January 28, 2005 Decided: February 17, 2005
Before LUTTIG, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nellie H. Roberson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert F. Daley, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Nellie H. Roberson appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting the
Government’s motion for summary judgment and ordering the
foreclosure and sale of her property. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Roberson,
No. CA-03-3117-5 (D.S.C. Sept. 28, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.