The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-2316•Kenneth Dawson v. Ceres Marine Terminals, Incorporated
04-2316Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 18, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2316
KENNETH DAWSON,
Petitioner,
versus
CERES MARINE TERMINALS, INCORPORATED; OFFICE
OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
(03-801-BRB)
Submitted: April 22, 2005 Decided: May 18, 2005
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Matthew H. Kraft, RUTTER MILLS, L.L.P., Norfolk, Virginia, for
Petitioner. Robert A. Rapaport, Dana Adler Rosen, CLARKE, DOLPH,
RAPAPORT, HARDY & HULL, P.L.C., Norfolk, Virginia, for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Dawson seeks review of the Benefits Review
Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s
award of longshore disability benefits pursuant to 33 U.S.C.
§§ 901-950 (2000). Our review of the record discloses that the
Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
Board. See Dawson v. Ceres Marine Terminals, No. 03-801-BRB (BRB
Aug. 25, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.