the Cit Group/equipment Financing, Incorporated v. Nabil J. Asterbadi

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2296
THE CIT GROUP/EQUIPMENT FINANCING,
INCORPORATED,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
NABIL J. ASTERBADI,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (CA-93-857-1)
Submitted: March 23, 2005 Decided: April 1, 2005
Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dale A. Cooter, COOTER, MANGOLD, TOMPERT & WAYSON, L.L.P.,
Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Steven N. Leitess, Jeremy S.
Friedberg, Andrew L. Cole, LEITESS, LEITESS & FRIEDBERG, P.C.,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Nabil J. Asterbadi appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for correction of judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P.
60(a). We have reviewed the record and find that the district
court did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion. See
Kocher v. Dow Chem. Co., 132 F.3d 1225, 1229 (8th Cir. 1997)
(stating review standard). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See CIT Group/Equip. Fin., Inc. v.
Asterbadi, No. CA-93-857-1 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 24, 2004 & entered
Sept. 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --