The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-2273•Michael Craig Clark v. Snug Harbor Property Owners Association
04-2273Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 14, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2273
MICHAEL CRAIG CLARK; EVE ANNA CLARK,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
SNUG HARBOR PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (CA-03-45-2)
Submitted: February 9, 2005 Decided: February 14, 2005
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Craig Clark, Eve Anna Clark, Appellants Pro Se. Thomas
Palmer Nash, IV, TRIMPI, NASH & HARMAN, LLP, Elizabeth City, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Michael Craig Clark and Eve Anna Clark appeal the
district court’s order denying relief on their civil action against
the Snug Harbor Property Owners Association. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Clark v. Snug Harbor
Prop. Owners Ass’n, No. CA-03-45-2 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 23, 2004). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.