The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-2222•Devakiruba J. Haywood v. ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED, Whites Consolidated Industries WCI
04-2222Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 18, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2222
DEVAKIRUBA J. HAYWOOD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED, Whites
Consolidated Industries WCI,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (CA-
03-259-8-26AK)
Submitted: February 2, 2005 Decided: February 18, 2005
Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Devakiruba J. Haywood, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Franklin
Thompson, Jr., Michael D. Malone, TALLEY, MALONE, THOMPSON &
GREGORY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Devakiruba J. Haywood appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to the Defendant on her Title VII claim
of discrimination based on national origin. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e
-2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Haywood v. Electrolux Home Prods. Inc.,
No. CA-03-259-8-26AK (D.S.C. Aug. 25, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.