The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-2196•Edward Bunn v. Arlington County
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2196
EDWARD BUNN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ARLINGTON COUNTY; RON CARLEE; AMI YORCZYK;
GREGORY GIRARDIN; MICHAEL LONGHI; FRANCES
O’LEARY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-04-628-1)
Submitted: January 10, 2005 Decided: February 2, 2005
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Bunn, Appellant Pro Se. Ara Loris Tramblian, Deputy County
Attorney, Peter Harlan Maier, Assistant County Attorney, Arlington,
Virginia; Jack L. Gould, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Edward Bunn appeals the district court’s orders denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his
motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Bunn v. Arlington County, No. CA-04-628-1
(E.D. Va. filed Aug. 27 & entered Aug. 30, 2004; filed Sept. 2 &
entered Sept. 3, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.