Mary E. Irving v. JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security Administration

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2195
MARY E. IRVING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social
Security Administration,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge.
(CA-03-508-7)
Submitted: February 28, 2005 Decided: March 23, 2005
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles D. Bennett, Jr., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant.
Donna L. Calvert, Regional Chief Counsel, Patricia M. Smith, Deputy
Chief Counsel, Shawn C. Carver, Assistant Regional Counsel,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; John L. Brownlee, United States
Attorney, Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney,
Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Mary E. Irving appeals the district court’s order
affirming the Commissioner’s denial of Irving’s claim for a period
of disability and disability insurance benefits, and a subsequent
order denying her motion for reconsideration. We must uphold the
decision to deny benefits if the decision is supported by
substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. See 42
U.S.C. § 405(g) (2000); Craig v. Chater, 76 F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir.
1996). We have thoroughly reviewed the administrative record, the
parties’ briefs, and the district court’s opinion and orders, and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Irving v. Barnhart, No. CA-03-508-7
(W.D. Va. May 14, 2004; July 21, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --