The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-2163•Rudy Harianto v. ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General
04-2163Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 2, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2163
RUDY HARIANTO,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A79-318-272)
Submitted: February 18, 2005 Decided: March 2, 2005
Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
H. Raymond Fasano, MADEO & FASANO, New York, New York, for
Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M.
Jocelyn Lopez Wright, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, W. Lindsey
Wilson, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Rudy Harianto, a native and citizen of Indonesia,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen immigration
proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and
find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny the petition for
review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Harianto,
No. A79-318-272 (B.I.A. Aug. 26, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.