The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-2156•Sherika L. Jones v. Tyson Foods, Incorporated
04-2156Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 14, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2156
SHERIKA L. JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TYSON FOODS, INCORPORATED; JAKE CLARKE, a/k/a
Daniel Clarke,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (CA-04-276-3)
Submitted: February 28, 2005 Decided: April 14, 2005
Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael D. Hancock, PETTY, MULLEN, HANCOCK, P.L.L.C., Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellant. Rafael E. Morell, OGLETREE, DEAKINS,
NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellee Tyson
Foods, Inc.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Sherika L. Jones appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on her Title VII action. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See Jones v. Tyson Foods, Inc.,
No. CA-04-276-3 (E.D. Va. Aug. 13, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.