The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-2114•Judy Curry v. Pocahontas Times, No. CA-03-106 N.D.W. Va. Aug. 4, 2004 . We deny Curry’s motions to…
04-2114Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 14, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2114
JUDY CURRY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE POCAHONTAS TIMES, County newspaper,
business, located in Marlinton, WV; PAMELA
PRITT, Personally and in her professional
capacity as Managing Editor, The Pocahontas
Times; WILLIAM P. MCNEEL, Personally and in
his professional capacity as Editor and owner,
The Pocahontas Times; JANE PRICE-SHARP,
Personally and in her capacity as Editor
Emerita and owner, The Pocahontas Times,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior
District Judge. (CA-03-106)
Submitted: February 9, 2005 Decided: February 14, 2005
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Judy Curry, Appellant Pro Se. Martin Vaughan Saffer, Marlinton,
West Virginia, for Appellees.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Judy Curry appeals the district court’s order dismissing
her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Curry v. Pocahontas Times, No. CA-03-106
(N.D.W. Va. Aug. 4, 2004). We deny Curry’s motions to proceed in
forma pauperis, to suspend the briefing order, and to expedite and
transfer the case. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.