Robert M. Wyne v. Medo Industries, Incorporated

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2104
ROBERT M. WYNE; NICOLAS W. LEWIS,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
MEDO INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA-
02-1812-RDB)
Submitted: January 27, 2005 Decided: February 1, 2005
Before LUTTIG and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert M. Wyne, Nicolas W. Lewis, Appellants Pro Se. Sharon A.
Israel, JENKENS & GILCHRIST, P.C., Houston, Texas, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Robert M. Wyne and Nicolas W. Lewis appeal the district
court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of Medo
Industries, Inc., and denying their motion filed pursuant to Fed.
R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
grant of summary judgment on the reasoning of the district court,
see Wyne v. Medo Indus., Inc., No. CA-02-1812-RDB (D. Md. Mar. 25,
2004), and find no abuse of the district court’s discretion in its
denial of the motion for reconsideration. Collison v.
International Chem. Workers Union, 34 F.3d 233, 236 (4th Cir.
1994). We grant Appellants’ motion to place Appellants’ materials
under seal. We deny Appellants’ motion for oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --