Sikod Basung v. ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2100
SIKOD BASUNG,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A79-235-632)
Submitted: March 23, 2005 Decided: April 4, 2005
Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bokwe G. Mofor, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Paul J.
McNulty, United States Attorney, Robert K. Coulter, Assistant
United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Sikod Basung, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions
for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
(“Board”) denying his motion to reopen and to reconsider its
previous order affirming, without opinion, the immigration judge’s
denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the
Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the record and the
Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion
in denying Basung’s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2004).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review on the reasoning of
the Board. See In re: Basung, No. A79-235-632 (B.I.A. Aug. 17,
2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --